Foley v. Fix
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8587
FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MS. C. FIX; SERGEANT SANTIAGO; MS. SWISHER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-1341-R)
Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 21, 1996
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Foley v. Fix, No. CA-95-1341-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foley v. Fix (Foley v. Fix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.