Foley v. Exolon-Esk Corp.

261 A.D.2d 835, 689 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4862
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs’ submissions in opposition to defendant’s motion raised an issue of fact whether the presence of a greasy substance on defendant’s loading dock was a dangerous condition that occurred at regular intervals so as to constitute constructive notice (see, Morales v Jolee Consolidators, 173 AD2d 315; Weisenthal v Pickman, 153 AD2d 849, 851). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Michalek, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foley v. Exolon-Esk Corp., 261 A.D.2d 835, 689 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

261 A.D.2d 835 (Foley v. Exolon-Esk Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cotter v. Lasco, Inc.
2021 NY Slip Op 04293 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)