Foley v. Equitable Investment Co.

110 A. 239, 267 Pa. 514, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 901
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 26, 1920
DocketAppeal, No. 250
StatusPublished

This text of 110 A. 239 (Foley v. Equitable Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foley v. Equitable Investment Co., 110 A. 239, 267 Pa. 514, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 901 (Pa. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Frederick M. Jackson, John Waldron and Orton W. Albee, while transacting business as partners, bor[516]*516rowed moneys from P. T. Foley, the appellee, to whom they paid usurious rates of interest. The partnership became the appellant corporation, which gave its obligations to the appellee for his claims against the partnership and for loans made to itself. He entered judgment against it on a judgment note which it had given to cover its obligations to him, and the same was opened to allow proof of the payments of usurious interest as set-offs. On the trial of the issue, without a jury, to determine the amount due on the judgment, the defendant claimed credits for usurious interest paid, not only by it, but by the partnership. The court refused to allow any set-off for such interest paid by the partnership, and this was undoubtedly correct: Little’s Estate, 244 Pa. 368.

The complaint of the appellant is dismissed and the judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Litle's Estate
90 A. 733 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A. 239, 267 Pa. 514, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foley-v-equitable-investment-co-pa-1920.