Foley v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Foley v. Campbell

72 P. 1099, 66 Kan. 801, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 186

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedApril 11, 1903

DocketNo. 13,062

StatusPublished

This text of 72 P. 1099 (Foley v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foley v. Campbell, 72 P. 1099, 66 Kan. 801, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 186 (kan 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The principal questions presented by plaintiff in error arise upon instructions given and refused; but as no objections were made nor exceptions taken to these rulings they are not open to our consideration. For the same reason the ruling of the court on a motion to strike out portions of the petition cannot be reviewed. We find nothing substantial in the complaints as to the admission and exclusion of testimony offered by the parties, nor as to the special findings of the jury. No material error appearing in the record the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The principal questions presented by plaintiff in error arise upon instructions given and refused; but as no objections were made nor exceptions taken to these rulings they are not open to our consideration. For the same reason the ruling of the court on a motion to strike out portions of the petition cannot be reviewed. We find nothing substantial in the complaints as to the admission and exclusion of testimony offered by the parties, nor as to the special findings of the jury. No material error appearing in the record the judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 P. 1099, 66 Kan. 801, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foley-v-campbell-kan-1903.