Foland v. Federal Bureau of Investigations

• Court: District Court, District of Columbia
• Decided: April 6, 2023
• Docket: Civil Action No. 2023-0761
• Status: Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JOHN EDWARD FOLAND, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 23-00761 (UNA) ) ) FEDERAL BUREAU ) OF INVESTIGATION, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of Plaintiff’s pro se complaint and

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application and

dismiss the complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3)

(requiring the court to dismiss an action “at any time” it determines that subject-matter jurisdiction

is wanting).

Plaintiff has filed a “Complaint for a Civil Case Alleging Negligence” against the Federal

Bureau of Investigation (FBI). He seeks “Some substantial Offer.” Compl., Sec. IV. Relief. The

United States, of which the FBI is a part, may be sued only upon consent. United States v. Mitchell,

445 U.S. 535, 538 (1980) (citation omitted). A waiver of the United States’ immunity “must be

unequivocally expressed in statutory text, and [it cannot] be implied.” Lane v. Pena, 518 U.S. 187,

192 (1996) (citations omitted).

In the caption of the complaint, Plaintiff cites the diversity statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. That

statute is inapposite because it authorizes suits against “citizens” of States, which the United States

clearly is not. The Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80, waives the United States’

1 immunity with respect to certain tort claims for money damages but only after the claim has been

presented to the agency and either “finally denied by the agency in writing and sent by certified or

registered mail” or not acted upon within six months of presentment. 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a); see

McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1993) (“The FTCA bars claimants from bringing suit

in federal court until they have exhausted their administrative remedies.”); GAF Corp. v. United

States, 818 F.2d 901, 904 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (“Section 2675(a) imposes . . . an administrative-filing

requirement, satisfaction of which is a jurisdictional prerequisite to the maintenance of a tort suit

against the United States.”). Nothing in the complaint suggests that Plaintiff presented a claim to

the FBI, much less exhausted his administrative remedies. Therefore, the complaint will be

dismissed by separate order.

_________/s/___________ TANYA S. CHUTKAN Date: April 6, 2023 United States District Judge