Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of America

108 S.W. 1199, 129 Mo. App. 655, 1908 Mo. App. LEXIS 173
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 2, 1908·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

This case was here on a former appeal prosecuted by defendant and the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded on account of an erroneous ruling on a question of evidence. [121 Mo. App. 548.] At the second trial, plaintiff again prevailed and defendant again has. appealed. We very fully covered the case in its various aspects in our former opinion and find from a close inspection of the record that ifc was retried in substantial conformity with the views expressed. Many points are urged for a reversal of the judgment but none of them is well taken.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of America, 108 S.W. 1199, 129 Mo. App. 655, 1908 Mo. App. LEXIS 173 (Mo. Ct. App. 1908).

108 S.W. 1199 (Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Olliff
21 S.E.2d 534 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. McDonald
150 S.W.2d 715 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1941)
Principi v. Columbian Mut. Life Ins. Co.
84 S.W.2d 587 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1935)
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Myers
172 S.E. 279 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1934)