Fogle v. State
This text of 1939 OK CR 93 (Fogle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff in error, Jesse Fogle, was by information charged with the crime of murder by killing one John Hurt, in said county, on or about the 21st day of March, 1937. On his trial the jury returned their verdict finding him guilty of manslaughter in the first degree, leaving the punishment to the court.
Motion for new trial was denied. On November 19, 1937, the court rendered judgment and he was sentenced to serve a term of ten years in the state penitentiary.
From the judgment an appeal was duly perfected by filing in this court on May 17, 1938, a petition in error with case-made attached.
*147 On July 27, 1938, application for extension of 60 days to serve and file brief was granted.
On September 14, 1938, the following motion to dismiss was filed:
“Comes now the plaintiff in error, Jesse Fogle, by and through his attorneys of record, H. H. Brown and J. B. Champion, and dismisses his appeal in the above entitled and numbered case.
“Dated this the 13th day of September, 1938.
“Jesse Fogle, plaintiff in error
“By J. B. Champion,
“H. H. Brown,
“His Attorneys.”
On September 28th the motion to dismiss was submitted.
An appeal may be taken to this court by a defendant as a matter of constitutional right from any judgment rendered against him in a court of record. It is a privilege granted by the law to persons convicted of crime which they may exercise at their option.
When an appeal has been taken, unless good cause is shown to the contrary this court has uniformly permitted the plaintiff in error to dismiss his appeal at his election. Hancock v. State, 57 Okla. Cr. 329, 48 P. 2d 348; McDessey v. State, 61 Okla. Cr. 345, 68 P. 2d 113.
In the instant case it appears that plaintiff in error is now serving his sentence and there is no reason made to appear why the dismissal should not be ordered in compliance with the motion to dismiss.
It is therefore adjudged and ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed, and the case remanded to the district court of Carter county.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1939 OK CR 93, 93 P.2d 19, 67 Okla. Crim. 146, 1939 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fogle-v-state-oklacrimapp-1939.