Fogle v. Fogle

84 So. 2d 317
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 6, 1956·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined and judgment appealed from is affirmed on authority of Jones v. Carpenter, 90 Fla. 407, 106 So. 127, 43 A.L.R. 1409; Osgood v. Osgood, 78 Mich. 290, 44 N.W. 325; Craven v. Hartley, 102 Fla. 282, 135 So. 899; Oates v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 107 Fla. 224, 144 So. 418, and Boynton v. Williams, 108 Fla. 368, 146 So. 663.

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fogle v. Fogle, 84 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 1956).

84 So. 2d 317 (Fogle v. Fogle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Davis
290 So. 2d 30 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Redditt v. State
84 So. 2d 317 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)