Fogle v. Delmas

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Fogle v. Delmas

11 La. Ann. 200

DecidedMarch 15, 1856

StatusPublished

This text of 11 La. Ann. 200 (Fogle v. Delmas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fogle v. Delmas, 11 La. Ann. 200 (La. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

(Merrick, C. J., absent.) The plaintiff sues for the restoration of money deposited. The judgment of the court below was in her favor; and we think that judgment is fully justified by the evidence.

There was error, however, in allowing interest from the date of the deposit. It was only due from the date of the demand for restitution. C. C. 2919.

It is therefore adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be amended ; that plaintiff recover of defendant, one thousand and ten dollars, with interest from judicial demand, (October 26th, 1853,) and costs of the District Court; those of appeal to be paid by plaintiff and appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buchanan, J.

(Merrick, C. J., absent.) The plaintiff sues for the restoration of money deposited. The judgment of the court below was in her favor; and we think that judgment is fully justified by the evidence.

There was error, however, in allowing interest from the date of the deposit. It was only due from the date of the demand for restitution. C. C. 2919.

It is therefore adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be amended ; that plaintiff recover of defendant, one thousand and ten dollars, with interest from judicial demand, (October 26th, 1853,) and costs of the District Court; those of appeal to be paid by plaintiff and appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 La. Ann. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fogle-v-delmas-la-1856.