Fogh v. U.S. Bankruptcy Court

46 F. App'x 500
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2002·No. No. 01-36068; D.C. No. CV-00-01991-JCC·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Linda L. Fogh, a Chapter 7 debtor, appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying her motions to vacate the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of her amended complaint, and denying reconsideration. [501] We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Mitchell v. Burt Vetterlein & Bushnell PC (In re Stein), 197 F.3d 421, 424 (9th Cir.1999); Shalit v. Coppe, 182 F.3d 1124, 1126-27 (9th Cir.1999), and we affirm.

Because the district court’s decisions did not rest upon an erroneous view of the law, we find no error. See In re Stein, 197 F.3d at 424.

We deny the request for judicial notice contained in Fogh’s August 6, 2002 supplemental statement.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fogh v. U.S. Bankruptcy Court, 46 F. App'x 500 (9th Cir. 2002).

46 F. App'x 500 (Fogh v. U.S. Bankruptcy Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related