Fogg v. Moulton

59 N.H. 499
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 N.H. 499 (Fogg v. Moulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fogg v. Moulton, 59 N.H. 499 (N.H. 1880).

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

The defendant having, apparently through inadvertence, omitted to ask the witnesses whether the will was sealed when it was signed, the case would have been opened, on his motion, for evidence on that point when the objection was made during the closing argument. The time when the objection was *501 made is significant. There was evidence on the question, and the instructions were correct.

The law of insanity applicable to the case was fully stated in the charge, and each party could make an application of the law to his view of the evidence, in argument. It was not error of law for the court to refuse to make such application. P. M. L. Ins. Co. v. Clark, ante 845.

Judgment on the verdict.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minot v. Boston & Maine Railroad
66 A. 825 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 N.H. 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fogg-v-moulton-nh-1880.