Fogg v. Inhabitants of Nahant

106 Mass. 278
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 15, 1871·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Morton, J.

When these cases were before the court at a former term, it was decided, after mature and careful consideration, that the facts, as there reported, brought them within the rule laid down in Davis v. Dudley, 4 Allen, 557, and Titus v. Northbridge, 97 Mass. 258. See Fogg v. Nahant, 98 Mass. 578. We are unable to see that the report of the evidence at the second trial presents the cases in any different aspect. It was substantially the same as at the first trial, and shows that at the time of the accident, and for some time before, the horses were beyond the control of their driver, and that this fact contributed to the accident. The ruling of the presiding judge directing verdicts for the defendants was therefore correct.

Judgments on the verdicts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fogg v. Inhabitants of Nahant, 106 Mass. 278 (Mass. 1871).

106 Mass. 278 (Fogg v. Inhabitants of Nahant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Igo v. City of Cambridge
95 N.E. 557 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
City of Denver v. Utzler
38 Colo. 300 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1906)
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Aven
32 S.W. 500 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1895)
Bleil v. Detroit Street Railway Co.
57 N.W. 117 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)
Higgins v. City of Boston
20 N.E. 105 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1889)