Fogg-El v. McKoy

Fourth Circuit

Fogg-El v. McKoy

588 F. App'x 252

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2014·No. No. 14-7368·Published

Opinion

[253] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenyatta Everett-Denroy Fogg-El appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fogg-El v. McKoy, No. 5:14-ct-03053-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2014). We deny as unnecessary Fogg-El’s motion for a certificate of appealability, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[253] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenyatta Everett-Denroy Fogg-El appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fogg-El v. McKoy, No. 5:14-ct-03053-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2014). We deny as unnecessary Fogg-El’s motion for a certificate of appealability, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Fogg-El v. McKoy, 588 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

588 F. App'x 252 (Fogg-El v. McKoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related