Fogerty v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
14 N.W. 878, 30 Minn. 185, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 119
This text of 14 N.W. 878 (Fogerty v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fogerty v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co., 14 N.W. 878, 30 Minn. 185, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 119 (Mich. 1883).
Opinion
The paper-book contains abundant testimony reasonably tending to sustain the plaintiff’s verdict. We discover nothing, either in the evidence or in the authorities cited by defendant’s counsel, to take this appeal out of the settled general rule in accordance with which we have repeatedly refused to disturb a verdict in such circumstances.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
14 N.W. 878, 30 Minn. 185, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fogerty-v-minneapolis-st-louis-railway-co-minn-1883.