Fogel v. United States

Supreme Court

Fogel v. United States

335 U.S. 865, 69 S. Ct. 136

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 15, 1948·No. No. 116·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Upon consideration of the Government’s confession of error and the record, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to va[866]*866cate its order denying the motion for a new trial and to grant a new trial.

Maury Hughes for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Upon consideration of the Government’s confession of error and the record, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to va[866]*866cate its order denying the motion for a new trial and to grant a new trial.

Maury Hughes for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.

Fogel v. United States, 335 U.S. 865, 69 S. Ct. 136 (1948).

Pincite

335 U.S. 865 (Fogel v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related