Fogel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fogel v. State

440 So. 2d 422, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22522

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 1983·No. No. 82-1008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions. We find no error by the trial court in admitting appellant’s statements or in admitting evidence of appellant’s prior assault upon the victim. We also find no error by the trial court in refusing to instruct the jury on the penalties for lesser included offenses. Delap v. State, 440 So.2d 1242 (Fla.1983).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions. We find no error by the trial court in admitting appellant’s statements or in admitting evidence of appellant’s prior assault upon the victim. We also find no error by the trial court in refusing to instruct the jury on the penalties for lesser included offenses. Delap v. State, 440 So.2d 1242 (Fla.1983).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Fogel v. State, 440 So. 2d 422, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22522 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

440 So. 2d 422 (Fogel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related