Fofanah v. Holder

Eighth Circuit

Fofanah v. Holder

350 F. App'x 84

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedNovember 3, 2009

DocketNo. 08-2878

StatusPublished

This text of 350 F. App'x 84 (Fofanah v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fofanah v. Holder, 350 F. App'x 84 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Abubakarr Fofanah petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his April 2008 motion to reopen. After careful review, we conclude the BIA did not abuse its discretion in finding that Fofanah did not show materially changed country conditions warranting reopening. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i), (ii) (motion to reopen); Habchy v. Filip, 552 F.3d 911, 912-13 (8th [85]*85Cir.2009) (standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Abubakarr Fofanah petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his April 2008 motion to reopen. After careful review, we conclude the BIA did not abuse its discretion in finding that Fofanah did not show materially changed country conditions warranting reopening. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i), (ii) (motion to reopen); Habchy v. Filip, 552 F.3d 911, 912-13 (8th [85]*85Cir.2009) (standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

350 F. App'x 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fofanah-v-holder-ca8-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack