Fofana v. Ryder Trucks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fofana v. Ryder Trucks

289 A.D.2d 140, 734 N.Y.S.2d 449, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12376

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 289 A.D.2d 140 (Fofana v. Ryder Trucks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fofana v. Ryder Trucks, 289 A.D.2d 140, 734 N.Y.S.2d 449, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Giamboi, J.), entered March 19, 2001, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs submit competent objective medical evidence sufficient to raise issues of fact as to whether plaintiff Fofana sustained, inter alia, a significant limitation to his lumbar spine (see, Grill v Keith, 286 AD2d 247), and whether plaintiff J ohnson-Kamar a sustained, inter alia, significant limitations to both her lumbar and cervical spine (see, Adetunji v U-Haul Co., 250 AD2d 483). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Giamboi, J.), entered March 19, 2001, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs submit competent objective medical evidence sufficient to raise issues of fact as to whether plaintiff Fofana sustained, inter alia, a significant limitation to his lumbar spine (see, Grill v Keith, 286 AD2d 247), and whether plaintiff J ohnson-Kamar a sustained, inter alia, significant limitations to both her lumbar and cervical spine (see, Adetunji v U-Haul Co., 250 AD2d 483). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.D.2d 140, 734 N.Y.S.2d 449, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fofana-v-ryder-trucks-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack