Fofana v. Ryder Trucks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fofana v. Ryder Trucks

289 A.D.2d 140, 734 N.Y.S.2d 449, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12376

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 2001·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Giamboi, J.), entered March 19, 2001, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs submit competent objective medical evidence sufficient to raise issues of fact as to whether plaintiff Fofana sustained, inter alia, a significant limitation to his lumbar spine (see, Grill v Keith, 286 AD2d 247), and whether plaintiff J ohnson-Kamar a sustained, inter alia, significant limitations to both her lumbar and cervical spine (see, Adetunji v U-Haul Co., 250 AD2d 483). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Giamboi, J.), entered March 19, 2001, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs submit competent objective medical evidence sufficient to raise issues of fact as to whether plaintiff Fofana sustained, inter alia, a significant limitation to his lumbar spine (see, Grill v Keith, 286 AD2d 247), and whether plaintiff J ohnson-Kamar a sustained, inter alia, significant limitations to both her lumbar and cervical spine (see, Adetunji v U-Haul Co., 250 AD2d 483). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Fofana v. Ryder Trucks, 289 A.D.2d 140, 734 N.Y.S.2d 449, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

289 A.D.2d 140 (Fofana v. Ryder Trucks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related