Foeley v. State

828 So. 2d 483, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15177, 2002 WL 31323330
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 18, 2002
DocketNo. 2D01-3851
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 828 So. 2d 483 (Foeley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foeley v. State, 828 So. 2d 483, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15177, 2002 WL 31323330 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

SALCINES, Judge.

Roger Foeley appeals the trial court order which summarily denied his motion to withdraw plea. The denial is affirmed without prejudice for Foeley to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. If Foe-ley files such a timely motion, it shall not be deemed to be successive.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND and STRINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foeley v. State
869 So. 2d 26 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
First Paradee, Ltd. v. Jones
828 So. 2d 483 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
828 So. 2d 483, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15177, 2002 WL 31323330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foeley-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.