FOE Aerie 0582 Twin City v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.

1998 Ohio 240, 82 Ohio St. 3d 263
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1998·No. 1997-2100·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 263.]

FOE AERIE 0582 TWIN CITY, APPELLEE, v. OHIO LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION, APPELLANT. [Cite as FOE Aerie 0582 Twin City v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 1998-Ohio-240.] Search and seizure—Peace officers and authorized agents or employees of Department of Liquor Control need not identify themselves prior to entry to liquor permit premises, when—Reasonable expectation of privacy in liquor permit premises is minimal. (No. 97-2100—Submitted June 10, 1998—Decided July 1, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APE03-339. __________________ Fawley & Associates, Darrell E. Fawley, Jr. and Kurt O. Gearhiser, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Barbara A. Serve, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of AL Post 763 v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 108, 694 N.E.2d 905. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOE Aerie 0582 Twin City v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 1998 Ohio 240, 82 Ohio St. 3d 263 (Ohio 1998).

1998 Ohio 240 (FOE Aerie 0582 Twin City v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

AL Post 763 v. Ohio Liquor Control Commission
694 N.E.2d 905 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
FOE Aerie 0582 Twin City v. Ohio Liquor Control Commission
695 N.E.2d 249 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
AL Post 763 v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.
1998 Ohio 367 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)