Fodor v. Time Warner, Inc.

217 F. App'x 630
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 10, 2007·No. No. 06-55525·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gyorgy Fodor appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action [631] alleging abuse of process and other tort claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal order, Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish, 382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

Fodor’s two contentions on appeal are (1) the district court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the defendants’ motion to dismiss because a petition for a writ of mandamus was pending before this court in a different case brought by Fodor and (2) he was denied due process. These contentions are without merit.

We do not consider any issues that were not argued in Fodor’s opening brief. See Ind. Towers of Washington v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.2003). Accordingly, the district court’s order dismissing this action is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fodor v. Time Warner, Inc., 217 F. App'x 630 (9th Cir. 2007).

217 F. App'x 630 (Fodor v. Time Warner, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish
382 F.3d 969 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)