Fodor v. Duvoisin

352 So. 2d 85
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 1, 1977
DocketNo. 76-2371
StatusPublished

This text of 352 So. 2d 85 (Fodor v. Duvoisin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fodor v. Duvoisin, 352 So. 2d 85 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge in his findings and final judgment specifically stated that he had “ . . . reviewed Circuit Court File No. 74-3233, being Joint Exhibit No. B, received into evidence 10-7-1976 . . ..” Copy of court file No. 74-3233 is not a part of the record on appeal. The trial court’s finding was not based solely upon the agreed stipulation of fact by counsel (Joint Exhibit No. A) which is a part of the record on appeal. We cannot say that the trial court’s finding is wrong unless we have the same record that was before the trial court. Steinhauer v. Steinhauer, 236 So.2d 665 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, ALDERMAN and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Tutorship of Bogues
236 So. 2d 665 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
352 So. 2d 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fodor-v-duvoisin-fladistctapp-1977.