Foday Fofanah v. Breckenridge Property and Alonzo Tisdale
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 15, 2019
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00382-CV
FODAY FOFANAH, Appellant V. BRECKENRIDGE PROPERTY AND ALONZO TISDALE, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01307-E
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whitehill, Partida-Kipness, and Pedersen, III Opinion by Justice Whitehill The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard
dated April 2, 2019, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to
remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would
result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated April 2, 2019, we informed appellant the
docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing
statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. By
letter dated June 4, 2019, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because
appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of
payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written documentation
appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further
notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the required documentation, or
otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).
/Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
190382F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
FODAY FOFANAH, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-19-00382-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01307-E. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. BRECKENRIDGE PROPERTY AND Justices Partida-Kipness and Pedersen, III ALONZO TISDALE, Appellees participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellees BRECKENRIDGE PROPERTY AND ALONZO TISDALE recover their costs of this appeal from appellant FODAY FOFANAH.
Judgment entered July 15, 2019
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foday Fofanah v. Breckenridge Property and Alonzo Tisdale (Foday Fofanah v. Breckenridge Property and Alonzo Tisdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.