Fobes v. Meeker
3 Edw. Ch. 452, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 482, 1841 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 21
Opinion
decided, that the master should express his opinion upon the propriety of the questions objected to and require the defendant to answer such of them as were proper; and then if he refused and did not appeal from the master’s decision, the proper.course was to move for an attachment ; but that it was not correct to move for an attachment [453] against a party or a witness where it did not appear that the master had decided upon the question and required it to be answered.
Mr. Silliman, for the motion.
Mr. Charles Edwards, contra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fobes v. Meeker, 3 Edw. Ch. 452, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 482, 1841 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 21 (N.Y. 1841).
3 Edw. Ch. 452 (Fobes v. Meeker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
East River Bank v. DeLacy
37 Misc. 765 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
East River Bank v. De Lacy
76 N.Y.S. 927 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Reis v. Rohde
41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 161 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)