Home/New York Court of Chancery/Fobes v. Meeker

Fobes v. Meeker

3 Edw. Ch. 452, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 482, 1841 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 21
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedJanuary 25, 1841
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 Edw. Ch. 452 (Fobes v. Meeker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fobes v. Meeker, 3 Edw. Ch. 452, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 482, 1841 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 21 (N.Y. 1841).

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor

decided, that the master should express his opinion upon the propriety of the questions objected to and require the defendant to answer such of them as were proper; and then if he refused and did not appeal from the master’s decision, the proper.course was to move for an attachment ; but that it was not correct to move for an attachment [453]*453against a party or a witness where it did not appear that the master had decided upon the question and required it to be answered.

Mr. Silliman, for the motion.

Mr. Charles Edwards, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

East River Bank v. DeLacy
37 Misc. 765 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
East River Bank v. De Lacy
76 N.Y.S. 927 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Reis v. Rohde
41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 161 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Edw. Ch. 452, 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 482, 1841 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fobes-v-meeker-nychanct-1841.