Fobes Supply Co. v. Kendrick
159 P. 700, 92 Wash. 701, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 787
Opinions
Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court still adhere to the opinion heretofore filed herein as reported in 88 Wash. 284, 152 Pac. 1028, and for the reasons there stated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fobes Supply Co. v. Kendrick, 159 P. 700, 92 Wash. 701, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 787 (Wash. 1916).
159 P. 700 (Fobes Supply Co. v. Kendrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Lee
382 P.2d 491 (Washington Supreme Court, 1963)
State v. Herr
276 P. 870 (Washington Supreme Court, 1929)
State v. Giaudrone
186 P. 870 (Washington Supreme Court, 1920)
Ward v. State
125 N.E. 397 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1919)
State v. Bachtold
106 Wash. 550 (Washington Supreme Court, 1919)
State v. Ripley
176 P. 343 (Washington Supreme Court, 1918)
State v. Certain Intoxicating Liquors
172 P. 1050 (Utah Supreme Court, 1918)
State v. Martin
159 P. 88 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)
State v. Boeing
92 Wash. 699 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)