FOAC v. City Hbg, Pets.
Opinion
M.D. Appeal Dkt. 29 - 2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
FIREARM OWNERS AGAINST CRIME; : No. 724 MAL 2019 KIM STOLFER; JOSHUA FIRST; AND : HOWARD BULLOCK, :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal Respondents : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court :
v. :
: :
CITY OF HARRISBURG MAYOR ERIC : PAPENFUSE; AND POLICE CHIEF : THOMAS CARTER, :
:
Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether the Commonwealth Court’s decision to grant Plaintiffs, who have not been cited under the City of Harrisburg’s gun control ordinances and for whom any harm is remote and hypothetical, individual and associational standing to challenge the City of Harrisburg’s gun control ordinances, directly conflicts with this Court’s jurisprudence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
FOAC v. City Hbg, Pets. (FOAC v. City Hbg, Pets.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.