F.M., MOTHER OF A.D. AND A.D., CHILDREN vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
This text of F.M., MOTHER OF A.D. AND A.D., CHILDREN vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (F.M., MOTHER OF A.D. AND A.D., CHILDREN vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
F.M., MOTHER OF A.D. AND A.D., CHILDREN,
Appellant, Case No. 5D22-2308 v. LT Case No. 2020-DP-000137
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Decision filed January 12, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Daniel B. Merritt, Sr., Judge.
Joseph Anthony Manzo, Largo, for Appellant.
Andrew Allen Feigenbaum, of Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach, and Rachel Batten, of Children’s Legal Services, Brooksville, for Appellee.
Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeas and Amanda Victoria Glass, Senior Attorney, of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, and Ryan C. Tyler and Brooke M. Mesner, of Defending Best Interests Project, Ratzan, Weissman & Boldt, Boca Raton, for Statewide Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
EVANDER, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
F.M., MOTHER OF A.D. AND A.D., CHILDREN vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fm-mother-of-ad-and-ad-children-vs-department-of-children-and-fladistctapp-2023.