Flythe v. . Lassiter

153 S.E. 926, 199 N.C. 804, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 263
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 2, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 153 S.E. 926 (Flythe v. . Lassiter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flythe v. . Lassiter, 153 S.E. 926, 199 N.C. 804, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 263 (N.C. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant, at the' close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, moved for judgment as in case of non-suit. C. S., 567. The motions were overruled by the court below and in this we can see no error.

We have read the record and the able briefs of the litigants with care, and we can see no new or novel proposition of law involved in the controversy. It was mainly a question of fact for the jury’s determination, and they have decided for the plaintiff. We see no prejudicial or reversible error in law on the record. A repetition of the facts from the record and the law bearing on defendant’s assignment of errors we think unnecessary to set forth.

The litigation was between sister and brother; the jury decided the issue in favor of the sister. We are bound by the findings.

In the judgment we find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hayes v. Turner
391 S.E.2d 513 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1990)
Holt v. Holt
61 S.E.2d 448 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 S.E. 926, 199 N.C. 804, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flythe-v-lassiter-nc-1930.