Flynt v. Tribble

Supreme Court of Georgia

Flynt v. Tribble

91 S.E. 80, 146 Ga. 277, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 706

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 14, 1916

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 80 (Flynt v. Tribble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flynt v. Tribble, 91 S.E. 80, 146 Ga. 277, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 706 (Ga. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

1. An assignment of error in a motion for new trial, that the court failed and refused to rule out all of the documentary evidence offered by the plaintiff in fi. fa., relating to bills of sale and mortgage, as being immaterial and irrelevant, is not complete, in that a reference to the brief of evidence is necessary; and is also too indefinite to present any question for adjudication.

2. The evidence was sufficient to uphold the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans, P. J.

1. An assignment of error in a motion for new trial, that the court failed and refused to rule out all of the documentary evidence offered by the plaintiff in fi. fa., relating to bills of sale and mortgage, as being immaterial and irrelevant, is not complete, in that a reference to the brief of evidence is necessary; and is also too indefinite to present any question for adjudication.

2. The evidence was sufficient to uphold the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.E. 80, 146 Ga. 277, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flynt-v-tribble-ga-1916.

Opinion

2. The evidence was sufficient to uphold the verdict.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack