Flynn v. United States

Supreme Court

Flynn v. United States

348 U.S. 909, 75 S. Ct. 295

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 10, 1955

DocketNo. 442

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 348 U.S. 909 (Flynn v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flynn v. United States, 348 U.S. 909, 75 S. Ct. 295 (1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to defer consideration of petition denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Mr. Justice Black is [910]*910of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Harry Sacher for petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Tompkins, Robert W. Ginnane and Harold D. Koffsky for the United States. The motion to defer consideration was filed by counsel for appellants in cases then pending in various United States Courts of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to defer consideration of petition denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Mr. Justice Black is [910]*910of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Harry Sacher for petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Tompkins, Robert W. Ginnane and Harold D. Koffsky for the United States. The motion to defer consideration was filed by counsel for appellants in cases then pending in various United States Courts of Appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

348 U.S. 909, 75 S. Ct. 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flynn-v-united-states-scotus-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack