Flynn v. State

82 S.W.2d 980, 128 Tex. Crim. 513, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 261
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 9, 1935·No. No. 17117.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Conviction for misdemeanor theft; punishment, six months in the county jail.

The record is here without statement of facts or bills of exception. However, our attention is attracted to the fact that this court is without jurisdiction because of a failure to comply with the law in the matter of a proper appeal bond or recognizance. One who wishes to bring his case here on appeal from a misdemeanor conviction, must exhibit by a record, — a showing that he is in custody, or that he made a recognizance for appeal during the trial term of the court below, or gave an appeal bond after adjournment of said trial term. See article 830, C. C. P., 1925; Pope v. State, 114 Tex.Crim. Rep.,26 S.W.2d 635. In the record before us it is shown that after the adjournment of the term at which appellant was tried, he entered into a recognizance for appeal. This was error. He should have made an appeal bond approved as statute directs.

The appeal not being properly perfected, this court is without jurisdiction. The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

HAWKINS, J., absent. *Page 514

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flynn v. State, 82 S.W.2d 980, 128 Tex. Crim. 513, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 261 (Tex. 1935).

82 S.W.2d 980 (Flynn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Koerner v. State
218 S.W.2d 1004 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1949)