Flynn v. Shaw
This text of 47 A. 883 (Flynn v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court is of opinion that the case should have gone to the jury.
Upon the testimony the case is similar to Pilling v. Narragansett Machine Co., 19 R. I. 666. There was testimony to show that the stones were improperly piled, and a statement of the defendant amounting to an admission that the falling of the blocks was the cause of the injury because of improper piling.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 A. 883, 22 R.I. 328, 1901 R.I. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flynn-v-shaw-ri-1901.