Flynn v. Royal Development Co.

267 A.D. 935, 47 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5580

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: March 15, 1944
• Status: Published

Opinion

Motion by defendant under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for summary judgment upon the ground that the twenty-three actions are barred by the Statute of Limitations. Earlier motions under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice upon the same grounds have been denied. The orders were affirmed by this court. (Flynn v. Boyal Development Co., 265 App. Div. 592.) The order should be affirmed. Order affirmed, with fifty dollars costs in one action. All concur. [See post, p. 1011.]