Flynn v. Royal Development Co.

267 A.D. 935, 47 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5580

Opinion

Motion by defendant under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for summary judgment upon the ground that the twenty-three actions are barred by the Statute of Limitations. Earlier motions under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice upon the same grounds have been denied. The orders were affirmed by this court. (Flynn v. Boyal Development Co., 265 App. Div. 592.) The order should be affirmed. Order affirmed, with fifty dollars costs in one action. All concur. [See post, p. 1011.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flynn v. Royal Development Co., 267 A.D. 935, 47 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5580 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

267 A.D. 935 (Flynn v. Royal Development Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flynn v. Royal Development Co.
265 A.D. 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)