Flynn v. North American Life Insurance
This text of 115 Mass. 449 (Flynn v. North American Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action is brought by William J. Flynn upon a policy of insurance on the life of Garrett Royle, his father-in-law. The application states, and the policy shows, that the insurance was obtained for the benefit of Flynn; and the applica[450]*450tian was signed “ Garrett Boyle for William J. Flynn, ” The original premium was paid by Flynn for Boyle, and a receipt therefor given by the insurance company to Flynn in his own name; the annual premiums were paid by Flynn; part only of the first premium, and none of the subsequent ones, were repaid to him by Boyle. By the policy, the insurers promise and agree to pay the sum insured to Flynn and his representatives. But this promise and agreement is expressed to be made to and with Boyle and his representatives; and the policy is under seal. Boyle and not Flynn is the covenantee. It is well settled that upon an agreement under seal, none but a party to it can maintain an action at law. Sanders v. Filley, 12 Pick. 554. Johnson v. Foster, 12 Met. 167. Millard v. Baldwin, 3 Gray, 484. Northampton v. Elwell, 4 Gray, 81. Dicey on Parties, 101. Whatever therefore might have been Flynn’s right of action if the agreement sued on had been a simple contract, there was no sufficient privity between him and the insurers to maintain an action in his name upon this policy ; and it is unnecessary to consider the other grounds of defence. Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 Mass. 449, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flynn-v-north-american-life-insurance-mass-1874.