Flynn v. Murphy
This text of 240 A.D. 994 (Flynn v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to change place of trial from the county of Dutchess to the county of Queens and order granting motion to retain the place of trial in the county of Dutchess affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 117; Behrman v. Pioneer Pearl Button Co., 190 App. Div. 843, 845.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flynn-v-murphy-nyappdiv-1933.