Flynn v. Johnson
124 N.E. 673, 234 Mass. 36, 1919 Mass. LEXIS 992
Opinion
Whatever questions might have been raised I at the trial on the merits, cannot be presented as of right on a II motion- for new trial. The granting or the denial of the motion I on this and the other grounds therein set forth was wholly dis- II cretionary with the trial judge. 1
Exceptions overruled. U
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flynn v. Johnson, 124 N.E. 673, 234 Mass. 36, 1919 Mass. LEXIS 992 (Mass. 1919).
124 N.E. 673 (Flynn v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jensen v. Bregoli
6 Mass. App. Div. 418 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1941)
Lonergan v. American Railway Express Co.
144 N.E. 756 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Ryan v. Hickey
132 N.E. 718 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)