Flynn v. Jmp Restoration Corp.
This text of Flynn v. Jmp Restoration Corp. (Flynn v. Jmp Restoration Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________ ) JOHN FLYNN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-0102 (ESH) ) JMP RESTORATION CORP., ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for entry of default judgment. This case is an action
for legal and equitable relief under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(“ERISA”), as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980, 29 U.S.C.
§ 1145. Defendant was served with the complaint on January 27, 2010, but has failed to answer
or otherwise defend this action. The Clerk of Court entered default on April 20, 2010. Pursuant
to the Court’s April 22, 2010 Order directing plaintiffs to move for entry of judgment, plaintiffs
have moved for entry of default judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2).1/
The determination of whether default judgment is appropriate is committed to the
discretion of the trial court. Jackson v. Beech, 636 F.2d 831, 836 (D.C. Cir. 1980). For default
judgment, defendant must be considered a “totally unresponsive” party and its default plainly
willful, reflected by its failure to respond to the summons and complaint, the entry of default, or
1/ The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(1), and venue is proper under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(2). The Court has jurisdiction over defendant pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(2) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(k)(1)(C). the motion for default judgment. Gutierrez v. Berg Contracting Inc., No. 99-3044, 2000 WL
331721, *1 (D.D.C. March 20, 2000) (citing Jackson, 636 F.2d at 836). Given “the absence of
any request to set aside the default or suggestion by the defendant that it has a meritorious
defense,” it is clear that the standard for default judgment has been satisfied. Id.
Although the default establishes a defendant’s liability, the Court makes an independent
determination of the sum to be awarded in the judgment unless the amount of damages is certain.
Adkins v. Teseo, 180 F. Supp. 2d 15, 17 (D.D.C. 2001). Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2), the
Court shall award plaintiffs: (A) the unpaid contributions; (B) interest on the unpaid
contributions; (C) liquidated damages in an amount equal to the greater of (i) interest on the
unpaid contributions, or (ii) 20 percent (or such higher percentage as may be permitted under
Federal or State law) of the amount determined by the court under subparagraph (A); (D)
reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of the action, to be paid by the defendant; and (E) such other
legal or equitable relief as the court deems appropriate. The Court may rely on detailed affidavits
or documentary evidence to determine the appropriate sum for default judgment. Flynn v.
Mastro Masonry Contractors, 237 F. Supp. 2d 66, 69 (D.D.C. 2002).
Plaintiffs have filed the declarations of David F. Stupar, Executive Director of the
Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund (“the Fund”), and Ira R. Mitzner, Esq.,
in support of the motion for default judgment. Based on the declarations, the Court finds that
plaintiffs have established damages in the amount of $13,839.99 in unpaid contributions to the
Fund for work performed during the period May through October 2009, pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
§ 1132(g)(2)(A); $1,268.97 in interest on those unpaid contributions, pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
§ 1132(g)(2)(B); and $2,768.06 for liquidated damages assessed on unpaid contributions,
2 pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(C)(ii). In addition, plaintiffs are entitled to attorney’s fees in
the amount of $1,452.50 and costs in the amount of $527.00, pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
§ 1132(g)(2)(D).
Therefore, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2), judgment will be entered for plaintiffs in
the amount of $19,856.52. A separate Order of judgment will accompany this opinion.
/s/ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge
Date: April 23, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Flynn v. Jmp Restoration Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flynn-v-jmp-restoration-corp-dcd-2010.