Flynn v. Greenberg
This text of 6 A.D.2d 871 (Flynn v. Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by a guest of a tenant in a multiple dwelling against the landlord to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from a judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict, dismissing the amended complaint. Judgment reversed, without costs, and a new trial granted. The conduct of respondent’s counsel throughout the trial was so prejudicial as to deprive appellant of a fair trial; therefore, there must be a new trial in the interests of justice. It is unfortunate that this corrective appellate action must be taken, for the verdict was amply supported by the evidence. (French v. City of New York, 286 App. Div. 1085; Nicholas v. Rosenthal, 283 App. Div. 9; George v. Owners Trucking Corp., 264 App. Div. 831.) Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 A.D.2d 871, 177 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flynn-v-greenberg-nyappdiv-1958.