Flynn v. Flynn
390 So. 2d 1252, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18202
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Flynn v. Flynn. Read the opinion of the Court — 433 So. 2d 1037 →
Opinion
Upon review of the record and briefs in this case, particularly considering the financial position of the parties, we determine that the trial judge’s award was within his broad scope of discretion and cannot be classified as unreasonable or arbitrary. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flynn v. Flynn, 390 So. 2d 1252, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18202 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).
390 So. 2d 1252 (Flynn v. Flynn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)