Flynn v. Chadbourn Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Flynn v. Chadbourn Lumber Co.

120 S.E. 926, 186 N.C. 782, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 364

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 20, 1923·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Upon warmly contested issues of fact, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. We have found no sufficient reason for disturbing the result of the trial. Hence the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

There was also a motion, filed by appellant in this Court, for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Upon an examination of the affidavits, filed by both sides in regard to the present motion, we are of opinion that it must be overruled, and it is therefore disallowed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

Upon warmly contested issues of fact, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. We have found no sufficient reason for disturbing the result of the trial. Hence the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

There was also a motion, filed by appellant in this Court, for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Upon an examination of the affidavits, filed by both sides in regard to the present motion, we are of opinion that it must be overruled, and it is therefore disallowed.

No error.

Flynn v. Chadbourn Lumber Co., 120 S.E. 926, 186 N.C. 782, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 364 (N.C. 1923).

Pincite

120 S.E. 926 (Flynn v. Chadbourn Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.