Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. Butler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. Butler

108 S.E. 244, 27 Ga. App. 300, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 846

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 26, 1921·No. 12479·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

It is stated in the briefs of counsel for both parties that the only question for determination by this court is whether the jury erred in finding that the account sued upon was not a mutual account between the parties. Under the evidence submitted, a finding that the account was a mutual one was not demanded, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

It is stated in the briefs of counsel for both parties that the only question for determination by this court is whether the jury erred in finding that the account sued upon was not a mutual account between the parties. Under the evidence submitted, a finding that the account was a mutual one was not demanded, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. Butler, 108 S.E. 244, 27 Ga. App. 300, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 846 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

108 S.E. 244 (Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.