Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. Butler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. Butler

108 S.E. 244, 27 Ga. App. 300, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 846

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 26, 1921

Docket12479

StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E. 244 (Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. Butler, 108 S.E. 244, 27 Ga. App. 300, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 846 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

It is stated in the briefs of counsel for both parties that the only question for determination by this court is whether the jury erred in finding that the account sued upon was not a mutual account between the parties. Under the evidence submitted, a finding that the account was a mutual one was not demanded, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

It is stated in the briefs of counsel for both parties that the only question for determination by this court is whether the jury erred in finding that the account sued upon was not a mutual account between the parties. Under the evidence submitted, a finding that the account was a mutual one was not demanded, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 S.E. 244, 27 Ga. App. 300, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flynn-harris-bullard-co-v-butler-gactapp-1921.