Flynn ex rel. Jew Yet Wing v. Tillinghast

First Circuit

Flynn ex rel. Jew Yet Wing v. Tillinghast

44 F.2d 789, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 3444

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided November 8, 1930·No. No. 2466·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree of the District Court must be affirmed. The refusal of the Commissioner, on February 20,1930, to reopen the ease “for the purpose of taking medical testimony as to his [the applicant’s] age” was not arbitrary or unfair. The case had previously been reopened “to afford the applicant’s examination by private physicians,” if desired, and the opportunity had been declined. Under these circumstances the denial of the request was not arbitrary or unfair.

The order or decree of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The decree of the District Court must be affirmed. The refusal of the Commissioner, on February 20,1930, to reopen the ease “for the purpose of taking medical testimony as to his [the applicant’s] age” was not arbitrary or unfair. The case had previously been reopened “to afford the applicant’s examination by private physicians,” if desired, and the opportunity had been declined. Under these circumstances the denial of the request was not arbitrary or unfair.

The order or decree of the District Court is affirmed.

Flynn ex rel. Jew Yet Wing v. Tillinghast, 44 F.2d 789, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 3444 (1st Cir. 1930).

Pincite

44 F.2d 789 (Flynn ex rel. Jew Yet Wing v. Tillinghast) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related