Flynn ex rel. Jew Yet Wing v. Tillinghast
This text of 44 F.2d 789 (Flynn ex rel. Jew Yet Wing v. Tillinghast) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decree of the District Court must be affirmed. The refusal of the Commissioner, on February 20,1930, to reopen the ease “for the purpose of taking medical testimony as to his [the applicant’s] age” was not arbitrary or unfair. The case had previously been reopened “to afford the applicant’s examination by private physicians,” if desired, and the opportunity had been declined. Under these circumstances the denial of the request was not arbitrary or unfair.
The order or decree of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 F.2d 789, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 3444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flynn-ex-rel-jew-yet-wing-v-tillinghast-ca1-1930.