Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Mertens
382 U.S. 816, 86 S. Ct. 38
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 11, 1965
DocketNo. 142
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases
This text of 382 U.S. 816 (Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Mertens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Mertens, 382 U.S. 816, 86 S. Ct. 38 (1965).
Opinion
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sánchez Betancourt v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
114 P.R. Dec. 691 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1983)
Manion v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
80 A.D.2d 303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Kupferman v. Pakistan International Airlines
108 Misc. 2d 485 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1981)
Manion v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
105 Misc. 2d 927 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Greenberg v. United Airlines, Inc.
98 Misc. 2d 544 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1979)
Cohen v. Varig Airlines
62 A.D.2d 324 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Cohen v. Varig Airlines
88 Misc. 2d 998 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Cohen v. Varig Airlines, S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense
85 Misc. 2d 653 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1975)
Rosman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
314 N.E.2d 848 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Varkonyi v. S. A. Empresa De Viacao Airea Rio Grandense
71 Misc. 2d 607 (New York Supreme Court, 1972)
Stolk v. Compagnie Nationals Air France
58 Misc. 2d 1008 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1969)
Long v. Pan American Airways, Inc.
213 N.E.2d 796 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
382 U.S. 816, 86 S. Ct. 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flying-tiger-line-inc-v-mertens-scotus-1965.