Fly v. Bailey
36 Tex. 119
This text of 36 Tex. 119 (Fly v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fly v. Bailey, 36 Tex. 119 (Tex. 1872).
Opinion
It appears from the record that the appellant recovered a judgment in the District Court against the appellee, from which he has attempted to appeal to this court; hut, disregarding his own attempt at appeal, he ran his execution'in the District Court, and satisfied the judgment and costs. This left him nothing to appeal from-, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Beard v. Hosier
107 N.E. 558 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
Bechtel v. Evans
77 P. 212 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1904)
Dunham, Buckley & Co. v. Randall & Chambers Co.
32 S.W. 720 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1895)
Meaders v. Gray
60 Miss. 400 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1882)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
36 Tex. 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fly-v-bailey-tex-1872.