Fly v. Bailey

36 Tex. 119
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1872·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Ogden, J.

It appears from the record that the appellant recovered a judgment in the District Court against the appellee, from which he has attempted to appeal to this court; hut, disregarding his own attempt at appeal, he ran his execution'in the District Court, and satisfied the judgment and costs. This left him nothing to appeal from-, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fly v. Bailey, 36 Tex. 119 (Tex. 1872).

36 Tex. 119 (Fly v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beard v. Hosier
107 N.E. 558 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
Bechtel v. Evans
77 P. 212 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1904)
Dunham, Buckley & Co. v. Randall & Chambers Co.
32 S.W. 720 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1895)
Meaders v. Gray
60 Miss. 400 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1882)