Flushing Savings Bank v. CCN Realty Corp.

73 A.D.2d 945, 424 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9858
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 73 A.D.2d 945 (Flushing Savings Bank v. CCN Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flushing Savings Bank v. CCN Realty Corp., 73 A.D.2d 945, 424 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

— In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, plaintiff mortgagee appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 10, 1979, as denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and required the addition of certain parties defendant. Order modified by deleting therefrom the provision requiring plaintiff to join the New York State Department of Social Services as a defendant in this action and adding thereto a provision denying that part of defendant Wagner’s cross motion that requested such relief. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and within 20 days after service upon the plaintiff of a copy of the order to be entered hereon with notice of entry thereof, plaintiff shall serve upon the parties named in the caption as "JOHN DOE #1” through "JOHN DOE #200”, inclusive, all papers in this action, as necessary parties defendant. It was improper to require plaintiff to join the New York State Department of Social Services in this action since the department has no property interest in the premises so as to make it a necessary defendant in the foreclosure action (see Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, §§ 1311, 1313, 202). However, Special Term properly denied plaintiffs motion to amend the caption of the action to eliminate, as parties, the facility’s residents, who have not yet been served in the action. As tenants whose leaseholds are subordinate to the mortgage of plaintiff, they are necessary parties and must be joined by plaintiff (see Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 1311, subd 1; Averill v Taylor, 8 NY 44; National Bank of North Amer. v Gloucester Equities, 82 Mise 2d 811; [946]*946contra, Home Life Ins. Co. v O’Sullivan, 151 App Div 535; Robinson v Hartley, 134 Mise 703; Genuth v First Div. Ave. Realty Corp., 88 Mise 2d 586; Douglas v Kohart, 196 App Div 84; see, also, Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v Childs Co., 230 NY 285). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wells Fargo Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Bronx 1202 Spofford Ave. L.P.
2025 NY Slip Op 50931(U) (New York Supreme Court, Bronx County, 2025)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bronx 1202 Spofford Ave. L.P.
2025 NY Slip Op 50931(U) (New York Supreme Court, Bronx County, 2025)
NYCTL 2012-A Trust v. Phillip
2016 NY Slip Op 8207 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Rockaway Improvement, LLC v. Danco Transmission Corp.
9 Misc. 3d 210 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2005)
6820 Ridge Realty, L. L. C. v. Goldman
263 A.D.2d 22 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
East New York Savings Bank v. Austin Mall Associates
224 A.D.2d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Home Savings of America, F. A. v. Freidman
205 A.D.2d 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Brandt v. 47-49 Charles Street, Inc.
157 Misc. 2d 299 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)
Matter of Village Rathskeller, Inc.
147 B.R. 665 (S.D. New York, 1992)
Polish National Alliance of Brooklyn, U.S.A. v. White Eagle Hall Co.
98 A.D.2d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Flushing Savings Bank v. Ahearn
96 A.D.2d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Flushing Savings Bank v. CCN Realty Corp.
82 A.D.2d 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 A.D.2d 945, 424 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flushing-savings-bank-v-ccn-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1980.