Flushing National Bank v. Goodson
This text of 38 A.D.2d 552 (Flushing National Bank v. Goodson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover upon a promissory note, defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 4,1971, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (notice of motion served in lieu of a complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3213) and (2) a judgment of said court, entered the same day upon said order. Order and judgment reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion, summary judgment should not have been granted in view of the triable issues of fact raised by the papers on the motion. Rabin, P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 A.D.2d 552, 328 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flushing-national-bank-v-goodson-nyappdiv-1971.