Flushing National Bank v. F. Ronald Mastriana, P.A.
419 So. 2d 400, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28741
Opinion
We conclude that the trial court erred in failing to grant appellant’s motion to dismiss and in requiring appellant to post a bond as a condition for undertaking this appeal. See Michigan National Bank-Michiana v. Baumgart, 408 So.2d 599 (Fla.2d DCA 1981) and Palm Beach Heights Development and Sales Corp. v. Decillis, 385 So.2d 1170 (Fla.3d DCA 1980).
Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flushing National Bank v. F. Ronald Mastriana, P.A., 419 So. 2d 400, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28741 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
419 So. 2d 400 (Flushing National Bank v. F. Ronald Mastriana, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
PALM BEACH HEIGHTS DEVE. v. Decillis
385 So. 2d 1170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Michigan National Bank-Michiana v. Baumgart
408 So. 2d 599 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)