Flushing National Bank v. F. Ronald Mastriana, P.A.
This text of 419 So. 2d 400 (Flushing National Bank v. F. Ronald Mastriana, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We conclude that the trial court erred in failing to grant appellant’s motion to dismiss and in requiring appellant to post a bond as a condition for undertaking this appeal. See Michigan National Bank-Michiana v. Baumgart, 408 So.2d 599 (Fla.2d DCA 1981) and Palm Beach Heights Development and Sales Corp. v. Decillis, 385 So.2d 1170 (Fla.3d DCA 1980).
Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 So. 2d 400, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flushing-national-bank-v-f-ronald-mastriana-pa-fladistctapp-1982.