Fluor Intercontinental, Inc v. David Dawson
Opinion
Reverse and Render and Opinion Filed November 19, 2014
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00209-CV
FLUOR INTERCONTINENTAL, INC., Appellant V. DAVID DAWSON, Appellee
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09-15340
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices FitzGerald, Evans, and Brown Opinion by Justice FitzGerald
The parties have filed an agreed motion for order effectuating settlement. We grant the
motion, reverse the judgment of the trial court, and render judgment that appellee David Dawson
take nothing from appellant Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.1
130209F.P05 /Kerry P. FitzGerald/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE
1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
FLUOR INTERCONTINENTAL, INC., On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Appellant Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09-15340. No. 05-13-00209-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald. Justices Evans and Brown participating. DAVID DAWSON, Appellee
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we REVERSE the trial court’s judgment and RENDER judgment that appellee David Dawson take nothing from appellant Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.
It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.
After all costs of appellant Fluor Intercontinental, Inc. have been paid, the obligations of Westchester Fire Insurance Company and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA as sureties on appellant Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.’s supersedeas bonds are discharged.
Judgment entered November 19, 2014.
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fluor Intercontinental, Inc v. David Dawson (Fluor Intercontinental, Inc v. David Dawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.