Fluor Corp. & Affiliates v. United States

132 F.3d 700, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 33055, 1997 WL 768052
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 30, 1997·No. No. 96-5130·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

A combined petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in bane having been filed by the APPELLEE, and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the APPELLANT, and the petition for rehearing having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the suggestion for rehearing in banc and response having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED, and it is further

ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is, DECLINED.

The mandate of the court will issue on November 6,1997.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fluor Corp. & Affiliates v. United States, 132 F.3d 700, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 33055, 1997 WL 768052 (Fed. Cir. 1997).

132 F.3d 700 (Fluor Corp. & Affiliates v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fleetboston Financial Corp. v. United States
68 Fed. Cl. 177 (Federal Claims, 2005)
Dresser Industries, Inc. v. United States
238 F.3d 603 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
Earth Resources Corp. v. United States
44 Fed. Cl. 274 (Federal Claims, 1999)
Dresser Industries, Inc. v. United States
73 F. Supp. 2d 682 (N.D. Texas, 1999)