Fluor Contractors International v. Hill

772 So. 2d 1160, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 410, 2000 WL 868563
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fluor Contractors International v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 67
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided June 30, 2000·No. 2970597·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

This court affirmed the judgment of the trial court, without an opinion, but with a written dissent by two judges. Fluor Con[1161]*1161tractors Int’l v. Hill, 772 So.2d 1156 (Ala. Civ.App.1999). This court’s judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Fluor Contractors Int’l, 772 So.2d 1157 (AIa.2000). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for the entry of a judgment consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

YATES, MONROE, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fluor Contractors International v. Hill, 772 So. 2d 1160, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 410, 2000 WL 868563 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

772 So. 2d 1160 (Fluor Contractors International v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Fluor Contractors International
772 So. 2d 1157 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2000)
FLUOR CONTRACTORS INTERNATIONAL v. Hill
772 So. 2d 1156 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1999)