Fluor Contractors International v. Hill

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Fluor Contractors International v. Hill

772 So. 2d 1160, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 410, 2000 WL 868563

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJune 30, 2000

Docket2970597

StatusPublished

This text of 772 So. 2d 1160 (Fluor Contractors International v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fluor Contractors International v. Hill, 772 So. 2d 1160, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 410, 2000 WL 868563 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

This court affirmed the judgment of the trial court, without an opinion, but with a written dissent by two judges. Fluor Con[1161]*1161tractors Int’l v. Hill, 772 So.2d 1156 (Ala. Civ.App.1999). This court’s judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Fluor Contractors Int’l, 772 So.2d 1157 (AIa.2000). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for the entry of a judgment consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

YATES, MONROE, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Supreme Court

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

This court affirmed the judgment of the trial court, without an opinion, but with a written dissent by two judges. Fluor Con[1161]*1161tractors Int’l v. Hill, 772 So.2d 1156 (Ala. Civ.App.1999). This court’s judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Fluor Contractors Int’l, 772 So.2d 1157 (AIa.2000). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for the entry of a judgment consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

YATES, MONROE, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

772 So. 2d 1160, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 410, 2000 WL 868563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fluor-contractors-international-v-hill-alacivapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack